In a negligence claim, what must be proven to hold a responder liable?

In a negligence claim, the key to holding a responder liable revolves around proving that injury resulted from a breach of duty. This means demonstrating that the responder failed to meet the appropriate standard of care expected in their role, which directly resulted in harm to the patient or individual. For a legal claim of negligence, it is not necessary to prove that the responder intended to cause harm, nor is the focus on whether they acted or failed to act in a specific manner during an emergency. Additionally, consent from the patient does not pertain to the establishment of negligence; rather, it relates to legal and ethical aspects concerning treatment. The crux of negligence is about the existence of a duty of care, its breach, and the resultant injury. Hence, proving that an injury occurred due to a failure to uphold that duty is fundamental in establishing liability in negligence cases.